Russian agents of influence and the war on fracking

“To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.”
-Sun Tzu

Soviet2500 years ago, Sun Tzu said that to defeat your enemy without using force is the acme of skill.  So, how does one do this?  It involves the use of various arts of statecraft that are not well-cultivated in the United States.  But the Russians have long cultivated them.

During the Cold War, the Russians conducted various types of covert and overt influence operations using agents of influence, disinformation, and forgeries (together called “active measures”), as well as propaganda, and offensive counterintelligence operations.  Their targets included: the national strategic leadership of NATO countries, as well as of other countries throughout the world; various non-governmental groups that had influence over governmental decision-making; the media, including the film industry; educational institutions at all levels; churches; unions; and the public at large.

Putin’s regime has not forgotten these techniques.  It has been using them blatantly in its attempts to annex Crimea and pry off several other provinces from Ukraine.  It has been using agents of influence to corrupt the decision-making of many of its neighboring countries.  It has used its intelligence services to bribe members of Parliament and other government officials in these countries.

The West has not been exempt from Russian “active measures.”  As Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the General Secretary of NATO, charged a couple of weeks ago, Russia has been using these various techniques to influence environmental organizations in Europe to oppose the domestic production of shale gas, specifically for the purpose of keeping Europe dependent upon Russian gas and vulnerable to Russian energy blackmail.

The General Secretary of NATO is not usually prone to making serious charges of this sort without solid intelligence — charges that some could interpret to be a conspiracy theory.

Does this mean that every Western European environmental organization is a Russian agent?  By no means.  But it does mean that there are people within some of these organizations who are Russian agents of influence or are influenced by them.

This was exactly the case with the so-called “peace” movement during the Cold War.  Then, the Soviets organized numerous front organizations, most of whose members were innocent people of goodwill who feared nuclear war and sought nuclear disarmament.  But these front organizations were also invariably filled with people who were directly doing Moscow’s bidding.

The U.S. government used to collect intelligence on these various techniques and would vitiate their effectiveness by declassifying the intelligence about them and publicizing them.  This was a decisive non-military dimension of the national security strategy of this country, which has been completely junked by recent administrations.  If the U.S. is to spare itself from excessive vulnerability to these types of strategic influence, we should reconstitute intelligence collection and analysis and expose these strategic influence operations. We should also reconstitute our counterintelligence capabilities, in order to protect against these “active measures.”

If the Russians won’t forget the lessons of Sun Tzu, is it wise for us to do so?

Soviet Influence Activities: A Report on Active Measures and Propaganda, 1986-87

5 thoughts on “Russian agents of influence and the war on fracking

  1. Russell Blaylock,M.D.

    This is an interesting article and these are important points that should be well heeded. But, one must also keep in mind that Soviet Disinformation, as all disinformation, depends on at least some modicum of truth. The truth is tracking has some real dangers and these should not be ignored. Now there are ways to accomplish tracking without these dangers and they should be adopted. One must not forget that by infiltrating environmental organizations and making valid points about environmental dangers the creators of disinformation also gains many adherents to a poller cause by showing that only they, the leftist radicals, really care about society–that is, the people, to use a collectivist term. This has been one of the main errors of the conservatives, they have allowed the left to steal the environmental issues of real concern. Environmental protection was a primary issue of early conservatism and was later stolen by the left. (This is not to say that earlier occultic writings on environmentalism did not exist). Responsible environmental approaches should be re-captured by conservatives. One should also keep in mind that corporations also engage in disinformation to support what they do. Our approach should be a responsible, well reasoned and independent one.

  2. Gregory A. Borys

    That’s an interesting thought. I hadn’t heard anything about the Russian government using active measures to discourage U.S. hydrocarbon production. I’ll have to do some research on that.

    1. Russell Blaylock,M.D.

      I apologize for the misspelling of fracking–the spellcheck automatically changed it to “tracking”. The important point is that we do not want to fall into the trap of taking a knee-jerk position–that is, that if the the Russian (collectivists) say one thing we must take the exact opposite view. It is easy for the leftist elements to lead us into defending an undefensable position–that is Fracking with harmful chemicals rather than using a safer method. By following such a path we turn the affected public against us. I see this all the time with a number of environmental issues–such as mercury poisoning, eating harmful diets, industrial pollution of lakes and rivers. Both Rush and Hannady gleefully tell the public how much they enjoy junk foods and that we should even accept it among our children. There are millions of health conscious people who turn against the conservative for taking such a knee jerk response rather than attacking the collectivist idea that it is the role of government to tell us what we shall eat and drink. We need to better understand how disinformation works. It is much like the Brer Rabbit story.

  3. Pingback: - John Lenczowski: Russian agents of influence and the war on fracking

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *